Which Countries Voted Against Palestine? A Clear Look at UN Voting Trends

In Explainer News by Newsroom10-09-2025

Which Countries Voted Against Palestine? A Clear Look at UN Voting Trends

The question of Palestinian statehood and recognition continues to dominate international politics and diplomatic discussions. And the most important of these discussions are the United Nations (UN) votes, where member states voice their stance on resolutions affirming Palestinian rights, statehood aspirations, and calls for peace in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

In 2024 and 2025, several key UN General Assembly votes have highlighted the countries that voted against Palestine or measures supporting Palestinian self-determination.

Though the majority of UN members overwhelmingly back Palestinian rights, a small yet significant group of countries consistently oppose such resolutions.

This article explores which countries voted against Palestine, why they do so, the broader support for Palestinian statehood, and how global geopolitics shapes these positions.

Which Countries Officially Voted Against Palestine at the UN in 2024 and 2025?

Recent votes at the UN General Assembly, especially those related to resolutions affirming Palestinian independence, condemning Israeli occupation, or supporting ceasefire initiatives, have revealed a consistent list of countries opposing these measures.

In a notable 2024 resolution supporting Palestinian independence, six countries voted explicitly against:

This vote emphasized Palestinian rights while condemning ongoing Israeli occupation, but these countries stood apart in opposition.

In 2025, additional votes saw opposition from some Pacific island nations and other countries including:

  • Palau
  • Papua New Guinea
  • Tonga
  • Tuvalu
  • Hungary
  • Fiji

These nations often aligned with U.S. and Israeli positions, opposing resolutions perceived as unilateral or prejudging peace negotiations.

What Are the Main Reasons Given by Countries That Oppose Recognizing Palestine?

The reasons behind these votes against Palestine vary, often reflecting a mix of political alliances, strategic interests, and interpretations of the peace process.

United States and Israel

The U.S. and Israel remain the most vocal opponents of unilateral Palestinian recognition at the UN. Both countries argue that statehood for Palestine should come through direct negotiations rather than international resolutions. They emphasize a two-state solution reached by mutual agreement as the only viable path to lasting peace.

The U.S. in particular stresses that recognizing Palestine outside negotiated terms undermines the peace process, encouraging premature actions that complicate diplomacy.

Argentina and Paraguay

In 2024, Argentina voted against Palestinian statehood largely under President Javier Milei’s administration, which took a strong pro-Israel stance. This marked a shift from previous Argentine governments, emphasizing moral and diplomatic support from Israel.

Similarly, Paraguay has historically aligned with the U.S.-Israeli policies on the matter, often citing concerns over security and peace negotiation protocols.

Pacific Island Nations

Several small Pacific island states, such as Micronesia, Nauru, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Tonga, and Tuvalu, consistently side with the U.S. and Israel. These votes reflect longstanding strategic, financial, and diplomatic ties with the United States. These nations often rely on U.S. aid and security partnerships, which influence their voting behavior at international forums.

Hungary and Fiji

Hungary's vote against Palestine aligns with its broader pro-Israel foreign policy stance, reflecting shifting dynamics in European politics where some countries show stronger support for Israel.

Fiji's position, similar to other Pacific nations, is influenced by its regional alliances and diplomatic priorities.

How Many Countries Support Versus Oppose Palestinian Statehood in Recent Votes?

Despite opposition from the countries above, the global trend overwhelmingly supports Palestinian rights and recognition. In recent votes, more than 170 countries voted in favor of resolutions supporting Palestinian self-determination and condemning occupation.

Most African, Asian, Latin American, and many European countries stand firmly behind Palestine's claims. The votes reflect a broad international consensus on the need to uphold Palestinians’ inalienable right to statehood and reject Israeli occupation as illegal under international law.

Some countries, like the United Kingdom, often abstain from votes. The UK usually advocates for prioritizing immediate conflict resolution before moving on to broader political recognition, aiming to keep diplomatic channels open for peace talks.

Interestingly, France announced plans in 2025 to formally recognize Palestine, signaling a shift in European attitudes and growing support within the EU for Palestinian statehood.

What Factual Data After 2020 Highlights Shifts in Countries' Positions on Palestine Recognition?

Recent years have seen noticeable shifts in countries’ policies and voting patterns related to Palestine:

  • Growing European Support: European nations, traditionally cautious on Palestine recognition, are increasingly vocal about Palestinian rights. France's 2025 announcement exemplifies this trend, signaling growing European willingness to support Palestine beyond abstentions or neutral stances.
  • Latin American Fluctuations: Countries like Argentina and Paraguay have seen political leadership changes influencing their stance. While historically supportive of Palestine, recent administrations have aligned closer with Israel, as seen in Argentina's 2024 vote against Palestinian recognition.
  • Pacific Island Nations’ Consistent Alignment: Small island nations continue their pattern of siding with the U.S. and Israel, influenced by strategic partnerships and aid dependency. This voting bloc has remained relatively stable over the last five years.
  • Increased Activism at UN: Palestinian authorities and supporters have intensified diplomatic efforts at the UN since 2020, leading to more frequent resolutions affirming Palestinian statehood and condemning occupation. These efforts contribute to the growing international recognition reflected in the rising number of affirmative votes.

How Does the International Community’s Voting Pattern Relate to Regional Geopolitics?

Voting on Palestinian statehood at the UN is often a mirror reflecting broader regional and global alliances and geopolitical interests.

Middle East and Western Alliances

Israel, supported strongly by the U.S., continues to influence many Western countries and some Latin American states to oppose unilateral recognition.

 The U.S.-Israel alliance remains a powerful force shaping votes, with diplomatic, military, and financial ties influencing national positions worldwide.

Strategic Pacific Partnerships

The small Pacific island nations voting against Palestine are often strategically aligned with the U.S. for security reasons and economic support.

These alliances show how geopolitical considerations extend far beyond the Middle East, affecting global voting dynamics on the issue.

European Union’s Balancing Act

Within the EU, voting patterns show a mix of support and caution. Countries like France push for formal recognition, while others prefer to abstain, balancing the need for peace negotiations with growing calls for Palestinian rights. This reflects Europe's complex diplomatic role between upholding international law and maintaining relations with Israel.

Africa, Asia, and Latin America’s Solidarity

Many African, Asian, and Latin American countries maintain strong solidarity with Palestine, reflecting historical ties, shared anti-colonial sentiments, and support for self-determination. Their votes form the backbone of the overwhelming international majority favoring Palestinian statehood.

While Israel and the United States remain the most consistent opponents at the UN, a handful of other countries, including Argentina, Paraguay, and several Pacific island states, join in opposing resolutions affirming Palestinian rights.

However, the overwhelming majority of UN members support Palestinian self-determination and condemn the Israeli occupation, underscoring broad international consensus.

Shifts in European policies and increased diplomatic activism by Palestine highlight evolving global attitudes toward the issue.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Which countries voted against Palestine in the recent UN General Assembly votes of 2024 and 2025?

Several countries voted against Palestine or resolutions supporting Palestinian statehood, including Israel, the United States, Argentina, Paraguay, Micronesia, Nauru, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Tonga, Tuvalu, Hungary, and Fiji. These votes reflect opposition to unilateral Palestinian recognition or concerns over peace negotiation processes.

2. Why do some countries oppose recognizing Palestine at the United Nations?

Countries like the U.S. and Israel argue that Palestinian statehood should be achieved through direct negotiations rather than unilateral UN resolutions. Other nations often vote against due to political alliances, strategic ties, or concerns that premature recognition could hinder peace efforts.

3. How many countries support Palestinian statehood compared to those opposing it?

Over 170 UN member states have voted in favor of resolutions supporting Palestinian self-determination and condemning occupation, showing overwhelming global support. Only a small group, mostly aligned with the U.S. and Israel, consistently oppose such resolutions.

4. Have any countries changed their stance on Palestine recognition since 2020?

Yes. For example, Argentina shifted toward a more pro-Israel position in 2024 under new leadership, while European nations like France have moved toward formally recognizing Palestine, signaling a shift in diplomatic attitudes post-2020.

5. How do Pacific island nations influence votes on Palestine at the UN?

Several small Pacific island countries consistently vote against Palestinian recognition, often due to strategic, financial, and diplomatic ties with the United States, which influences their alignment in international votes.

6. What role does regional geopolitics play in UN voting on Palestine?

Voting patterns reflect broader alliances—U.S.-Israel influence shapes Western and some Latin American votes, while many African, Asian, and Latin American countries support Palestine, showing solidarity based on historical ties and anti-colonial sentiment.

7. Are there any European countries supporting Palestinian statehood?

Yes, countries like France have announced plans to formally recognize Palestine, and many others support Palestinian rights or choose to abstain from votes to maintain diplomatic balance, reflecting evolving European views on the conflict.