Erdogan Warns Syrian Kurds on Damascus Integration Deadline

In Syria News by Newsroom01-10-2025

Erdogan Warns Syrian Kurds on Damascus Integration Deadline

Credit: REUTERS/Pilar Olivares/File Photo

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has issued a strong warning that Turkey may take military action against the Syrian Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) if they fail to integrate fully into the Syrian state as per the March 2025 agreement. Erdogan's stance comes amid heightened tensions over the future of Kurdish-held territories in Syria and Turkey's concerns over national security and Kurdish autonomy.

Erdogan’s Warning to Syrian Kurds

As reported by Sarah al-Suleiman of The Cradle, President Erdogan made it clear that Turkey will not tolerate the failure of the Kurdish forces to disarm and integrate into Damascus, which was part of a March 10 agreement with the Syrian government. He warned,

“If the sword leaves its sheath, there will be no place for the pen or for words,”

illustrating Turkey’s readiness to escalate militarily if the SDF does not commit to the integration process.

Omer Celik, spokesperson for Erdogan’s ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP), echoed this sentiment by describing the situation as a

“primary national security threat to Turkey”

connected to efforts within Syria to destabilise the country. Celik indicated Ankara’s intent to prevent any chaos that could arise from the continuation of Kurdish autonomous control, framing it as a direct threat to Turkish security.

Background on the Kurdish Forces and the Agreement

The SDF, led primarily by the Kurdish People's Protection Units (YPG), agreed in March 2025 with Syrian interim President Ahmad al-Sharaa to fold its military and civil institutions into state apparatuses. These include border posts, airports, and energy infrastructures, with the aim of restoring Syrian sovereignty in the Kurdish-controlled northeast, often referred to as Rojava by Kurdish factions.

Despite this, the integration talks remain stalled, partly due to mistrust within the Kurdish community and concerns over guarantees of Kurdish rights and security. Spokesperson Hevi Mustafa of the Syrian Democratic Council stated,

“We seek a peaceful solution but will not compromise on our rights and security,”

highlighting the Kurdish desire for meaningful protections within Syria’s framework.

Turkish Security Concerns and Military Readiness

Turkey views the YPG and by extension the SDF as terrorist affiliates of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), an insurgent group with a long-standing conflict against Ankara. As stated by Turkish Defence Ministry spokesperson Zeki Akturk, the failure of the Kurdish forces to disarm and integrate threatens not only Syrian unity but also Turkey’s national security. He specified that Turkish troops would maintain their presence in northern Syria until the border is secured and the “terror corridor” neutralised.

Turkish far-right Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) leader Devlet Bahceli has amplified these concerns, asserting that the SDF “appears to be within Israel’s orbit,” and labelling the group a threat that must be eradicated. Bahceli has been a vocal proponent of strong action against Kurdish forces, insisting that the SDF’s disarmament and disbandment should align with the PKK’s moves under Abdullah Öcalan’s calls for peace and political transition.

Syrian Government’s Position on Integration and Kurdish Autonomy

Syrian President Ahmad al-Sharaa stressed the importance of implementing the March 10 agreement, indicating that the window for diplomatic resolution is closing. He warned of the possibility that Turkish military action could resume if Kurdish forces fail to complete integration by December 2025. Al-Sharaa emphasised equal citizenship rights for Kurds within Syria but expressed scepticism toward Kurdish demands for decentralisation or autonomy, dismissing such moves as veiled separatism.

According to al-Sharaa, Syria is largely decentralised under existing laws, and further autonomy debates are premature. He appealed directly to SDF commander Mazloum Abdi, pointing out that Kurdish rights will be guaranteed within Syria’s unitary state framework, and that demands exceeding this would not be entertained.

Geopolitical Implications and International Reactions

The March 10 agreement was supported by multiple international actors, including the United States and Russia, aiming to stabilise Syria and reduce foreign military engagement. The US continues to distinguish between the SDF and the PKK, maintaining partnership with the SDF in counterterrorism efforts against ISIS, which contrasts Turkey’s designation of both as terrorist entities.

Turkey’s support for Syria’s newly formed government led by al-Sharaa also reflects Ankara’s strategic focus on limiting Kurdish autonomy. Analysts like Lina Haddad of Al-Monitor note that Turkey’s hardline stance complicates the Kurdish quest for political integration without ceding military control, exacerbating regional tensions.

Kurdish Response and Regional Concerns

Kurdish leaders maintain a cautious but firm position. While committed to dialogue with Damascus, they also signal readiness to defend their territories. SDF chief Mazloum Abdi warned that the ceasefire in northeastern Syria is fragile and depends on the finalization of political deals, cautioning that instability could resume if the integration process falters.

Pro-Kurdish politicians in Turkey express frustration over Turkish military threats, warning that renewed conflict would be disastrous for Kurds and regional stability. Pervin Buldan, a pro-Kurdish lawmaker, cited Abdullah Öcalan’s calls for peace but urged Türkiye to support rather than undermine Syrian Kurds, warning that any aggressive moves against Rojava would be unacceptable.

Military Presence and Future Prospects

Presently, Turkish military forces conduct intermittent operations and maintain a presence in northeastern Syria, asserting these actions are within international law and serve legitimate national security interests. Despite partial troop withdrawals, Ankara insists it will not leave until border security is ensured and Kurdish armed groups disarmed.

Turkey’s strategic patience appears to be reaching its limit, with a deadline in late 2025 for Kurdish compliance looming. The continuation or failure of the integration agreement will likely determine whether Turkey escalates military involvement or allows the political process to proceed.

The situation in northern Syria remains precarious as President Erdogan’s government positions itself ready to act decisively against the Syrian Kurdish SDF if they fail to fulfil their commitments for integration with Damascus. This stance reflects broader Turkish efforts to contain Kurdish autonomy and secure national borders amid complex international dynamics. Kurdish leaders express willingness to negotiate but insist on safeguards for their rights, while the Syrian government seeks to restore sovereignty under a unified state framework.