UNRWA Demands Clarity on UN Meeting with Gaza Humanitarian Foundation

In Human Rights News by Newsroom13-08-2025

UNRWA Demands Clarity on UN Meeting with Gaza Humanitarian Foundation

The United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) has called for urgent clarification regarding a recent UN meeting with the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), a controversial aid group backed by Israel and the United States. The meeting has sparked significant concern among UN agencies and humanitarian experts due to GHF’s alleged militarised operations and the severe humanitarian impact on Gaza’s population.

UNRWA Calls for Transparency Over UN Engagement with Gaza Humanitarian Foundation

As reported by The New Humanitarian on 13 August 2025, UNRWA has expressed serious concerns and demands urgent clarification about a meeting held between several UN agencies and large aid organisations with the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). The meeting marks a departure from months of strained relations between the United Nations and the GHF, which was created by Israel in February 2025 with support from the United States to deliver aid in Gaza.

The meeting, described by UNOCHA’s Joyce Msuya and InterAction’s Tom Hart as “constructive and open” in an email obtained by Devex, was seen as an attempt to lower public tension and explore ways to operate in complementary manners despite ongoing controversies.

GHF’s Controversial Role in Gaza’s Aid Distribution

The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, designed to replace previous United Nations agencies’ aid distribution functions, notably those of UNRWA, has attracted widespread condemnation. UN experts, human rights organisations, and humanitarian officials have repeatedly criticised the GHF for its militarised distribution model, which has led to over 1,400 deaths and thousands of injuries near its aid sites since late May 2025.

UN experts described GHF’s operations as

“an utterly disturbing example of how humanitarian relief can be exploited for covert military and geopolitical agendas in serious breach of international law”

and warned that the involvement of Israeli intelligence and US contractors under the guise of humanitarian aid demands urgent international oversight.

UNRWA’s Commissioner-General Philippe Lazzarini, as highlighted in statements on 1 July 2025, sharply condemned the foundation, noting that since GHF’s inception, over 500 starving people have been killed and nearly 4,000 injured while struggling to access food. He emphasised that the scheme has reduced Gaza’s aid distribution points from 400 to merely four militarised sites.

Humanitarian Crisis Worsens Amid Blockade and Conflict

UN reports indicate that Gaza has been suffering from a complete blockade of aid and commercial goods since 2 March 2025, with severe consequences for the civilian population of over two million people. The United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) outlined how telecommunications blackout and denied humanitarian movements have crippled aid delivery and response coordination.

UNRWA and partners have repeatedly warned that the war, blockade, and militarised aid distribution have created a "recipe for chaos," resulting in starvation, fear, discrimination, and desperation among civilians. The agency insisted on lifting the siege to allow UN-led humanitarian agencies to operate safely and at scale.

Tom Fletcher, the UN Humanitarian Affairs Coordinator, stressed,

“Hunger must never be met with bullets,”

condemning attacks on civilians, including those seeking and delivering aid, which violate international humanitarian principles.

Expert Calls for Immediate Dismantling of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation

On 5 August 2025, UN human rights experts voiced grave concern over GHF’s operations, describing the group’s activities as deeply problematic and contradictory to international humanitarian law which requires aid to be delivered impartially and neutrally.

The experts reminded that Israel, as the occupying power under international law, has binding obligations to protect civilians and ensure essential services, but the establishment of GHF—a mechanism seen as an extension of militarised control—undermines these principles.

They called for the immediate dismantling of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, highlighting the tragic toll of over 60,000 deaths in Gaza amidst forced displacement and severe famine conditions. Reports from Gaza’s Ministry of Health recorded 180 deaths due to malnutrition, including 93 children, underscoring the urgency of restoring protective and neutral humanitarian aid.

UN and International Community Reactions

The United Nations Security Council and various member states have affirmed the critical role of UNRWA as the backbone of the humanitarian response in Gaza, insisting no organisation can substitute its mandate and capacity. Denmark, for example, has expressed full support for UNRWA’s leadership and condemned any measures that obstruct its operations, urging compliance with international law by Israel to facilitate unimpeded humanitarian assistance.

Amid wide condemnation of the blockade and militarised aid distribution, the UN continues to advocate for restoring a unified, UN-led coordination of aid based on international humanitarian law principles, consistent with UNRWA’s mandate.

The demand by UNRWA for urgent clarification over the recent UN engagement with the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation reflects deep tensions within the humanitarian community regarding the conduct and governance of aid operations amidst the Gaza crisis. The GHF's militarised approach and the associated high civilian casualties have provoked widespread condemnation from UN officials, experts, and humanitarian organisations.

Multiple UN agencies and member states reiterate the necessity of returning humanitarian aid delivery to UN-led, neutral, and impartial mechanisms to ensure safety, dignity, and effective relief for the people of Gaza. Calls for dismantling the GHF highlight the critical need for international oversight to prevent the exploitation of humanitarian aid for military or political ends, and to uphold fundamental humanitarian principles during the ongoing conflict and blockade.